Academic Program Review Steering Committee Progress

Task	Progress	Status
Develop a working definition of "program" for purposes of review	Draft 2/8; to Deans 2/9	Complete 2/12
Develop a list of programs to be reviewed	Initial list to committee 2/11; revision 2/15	Final drafts to committee 2/18
Identify and define criteria for evaluation	First review 2/11; criteria in 4 categories 2/12; criteria in 5 groups 2/17	Final 2/24
Develop weighting/measuring for criteria	Initial discussion 2/17; continued 2/18	Sub-committees working; Discussion planned for 2/29
Identify the data/infomation to be collected	Ongoing discussion; most data identified 2/15; Data needs finalized 2/25	Determining availability
Develop the format/template for data collection and reporting	Templates developed for two sections 2/18; all section drafted 2/25	Refining cost-effectiveness templates 2/28
Develop a timeline for tasks to be accomplished to March 31
Design, implement and execute an ongoing communications strategy for the review process	First email to campus 2/16; website up 2/21	On-going development
Monitor progress of data collection and reporting