|
The
following pages provide guidelines for preparation of program evaluation documents
to be submitted for the Drake University Academic Program Review and Prioritization
process. The Academic Program Review Steering Committee, with representation from
every academic division of the University, has attempted to develop guidelines that
provide maximum opportunity for each program to present its strengths but which also
provides a realistic opportunity for the University to assess its strengths and its
needs and to make decisions about academic programming in the future.
This
document provides a program definition, lays out the criteria for assessment of programs,
and indicates questions to be asked and data to be provided in addressing the various
criteria. Every academic program in the University will prepare a review document
using thesedefinitions, procedures and criteria. Review documents will be prepared
and submitted according to a timeline that will be made available as soon as possible.
General Instructions
Review
documents for each identified program must include the six sections specified in
the Academic Program Review Criteria and Procedures. For each section, questions
to be answered and/or data to be provided are defined. Unless listed as optional,
all questions are to be answered and all data provided for each program.
A
template with headings and special notations is being provided for your responses
submission of reviews. Responses can be typed or pasted into the template. The guidelines
and the template documents provide page limits for various parts of the review. The
template is set up for one-inch margins, 10 point font and 1-1/2 line spacing. APRSC
set these guidelines in response to concern that review information be formatted
uniformly and be controlled in length. APRSC does assume however that those who will
be reading the documents will not interpret the page guidelines too literally but
will expect programs to hold close to the limits.
|