|
Academic Priorities and
Review Steering Committee Program Definition
The following definition of a program
will be used for purposes of identifying programs for prioritization and review:
A discrete education activity
that uses academic resources. It is separable for purposes of examination and the
resources needed to support it are identifiable.
Subsumed by this definition are all majors, minors, concentrations, general education
and service programs, certification programs, joint degrees and any other program
which utilizes academic resources.
Programs which meet this definition and which are located solely within one college/school
will be reviewed and prioritized by the Dean of the program's home college/school.
Programs which cross colleges/schools will be assigned to one unit, the one which
devotes the greatest resources to it, for review. However, input should be solicited
from all units which have a stake in the program. The location for review will be
determined by the Deans of involved colleges/schools in consultation with the APRSC.
Clarification of Program Definition
1. Every program that uses resources must submit a review document following the
format and procedures to be specified in the Program Prioritization and Review Criteria
and Procedures. The focus of the review is program not department. Any one department-level
administrative unit may have several programs.
The review document for a program
that has major, minor, general education and service components may be combined.
However, each of these dimensions must be addressed clearly, and resources devoted
to each of these dimensions must be analyzed.
The review document for a program that has minor, general education and service components
may be combined. However, each of these dimensions must be addressed clearly, and
resources devoted to each of these dimensions must be analyzed.
Any program that has only service and/or general education components must submit
a review that answers all relevant questions in relation to those programs.
2. Joint programs:
Joint programs which simply combine
two majors, with no extra requirements of resources used need not provide a full
separate review. However, such programs must be identified and their goals and purposes
discussed. Some criteria, such as goals and opportunity analysis must be discussed
for these programs.
3. Programs which have no faculty
whose primary appointments reside with the program:
Programs which have no faculty
whose primary appointments reside with the program, but which utilize faculty and/or
other academic resources, must submit reviews.
For example, if the curriculum of a program is based on courses offered as part of
other programs, the number of courses (course credit hours?) that they utilize from
various departments must be specified as part of their resources used. They must
address all other review criteria as well.
|