Sociology 130 Contemporary Chinese Society:

Morality, Discourse, and Subjectivity in 20th Century China

Fall 2001, J. Schneider, 130 Howard Hall; Hours: TR 2:00-4:30 and by appointment

Phone: 271-2158; Email: joseph.schneider@drake.edu

 

******************************************************************

The Course

The focus of this class is the dominant and contesting moralities, discourses, and subjectivities of twentieth-century China. A good case can be made that the dominant versions of each of these three (moralities, discourses, subjectivities) can be called "revolutionary" and so we will use these versions to help give focus and organization to the course.

Although too simple, one could think in terms of "pre-revolutionary," "revolutionary," and "post-revolutionary" moralities/discourses/subjectivities across this century in China and come away with an accurate understanding of the endless changes and movements that have taken place in China. Still, those would only be some of the stories we would want to consider. Along with, against, and sometimes supporting these revolutionary figures (images, ways of speaking, being, acting), one also could see what could be called--again, too simply--"traditional" as well as "modern" and/or "global" versions of each. We will try to get a clearer sense of this complexity across the century, while remaining mostly in an "overview" mode. The experience surely will leave you with more questions than answers, but since the course does not assume any particular knowledge of "China," that seems not a small accomplishment.

The course seeks to be interdisciplinary in that the materials we will consider and the issues that will stand forth for us are not just "sociological," but are of wide interest to people who look at and think about China and Asia from all sorts of viewpoints. There is also something of a feminist/gender theme in the materials and perspectives we will consider. The idea here is that we might gain insight into "China" as a social/cultural (rather than exclusively a geographical) space by considering the circumstances of women/men as particular ways of being (consider how it sometimes is possible to get a rich sense of a place by being immersed in the personal details of individuals who live there, of individual lives).

I first began to think about "morality in modern China" as I read a bit about the "Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution," dating most inclusively from the late spring/summer of 1966 until the fall of 1976, when Mao Zedong died. For me, it seemed to be a prime space through which to consider:

It also struck me that one could focus on morality as a general sort of process or phenomenon, across quite different cultural spaces/practices--from "here" in the United States, Iowa, Des Moines, Drake, your family, residence, persona, and so on, to seemingly (or not) similar sorts of things "there," "in China." We would want certainly not to deny differences, but we also might search for how the "different" and the "same" are recognized and perhaps in ways that we hadn't quite imagined before.

The course is one much more "about culture"--for instance, about language and representations; symbols, postures, faces, songs, stories, practices, and so on--than it is about the details of the historical moment, although I cannot imagine disconnecting the two. Please keep this last point in mind as you work through the materials. It will help us guard against the search for "universals" and against making too easy generalizations about how "all people are alike everywhere."

We begin our study in the 20 to 30 years prior to the Communist revolution of 1949, and, even before then, in considering some fundamental cultural and social themes of traditional Chinese life. Many of these themes reappear with a vengeance, while others are explicitly attacked, during the Cultural Revolution decade. We will be interested to see how this seems to happen and also to look at the consequences for people's lives, both in the cities of China but also in the countryside, where the majority (about 60-70%) of the population still lives. Toward the end of the semester, we will ask questions about the effects and implications of the moral campaigns and moral "mountains and valleys" created during that time for the shapes of social and cultural practice in China in the reform period, beginning in the early 1980s and continuing now. This period has been named one of "postsocialism" by one of the writers we will read (Rofel). It, clearly, also is a moment of "global" involvement in China, as we can read about in the daily news (one of the "best" examples of this is The New York Times, which you can get at a reduced rate in hardcopy at the D-Shoppe in Olmsted Center).

Finally, in learning about "China" and some Chinese people whose stories we will read and talk about, we also seek to learn about ourselves. While we search for this or that "truth" about China, we also search for and secure ourselves as people from a Western, highly industrialized, world-capitalist, and "democratic" ("morally superior"?) country, usually with a great deal of confidence about what is the "right" or "obvious" way things should be done and understood. We also should at least be aware that any effort to "know about" China and "the Chinese" is also in some sense an effort to get control over, to master it/them (as in, how are knowledge and power related?). In short, we will try to remain alive to questions about ourselves and our reactions to the issues that we frame in the very process of study.

The Reading

There are 6 books at the University Bookstore that you should purchase:

This is a sizable amount of reading. I have noted the weekly page counts in brackets in the outline, below.

We also will view some videos and films throughout the course (specified in the outline below). In some cases, I may ask you to see the films outside of class time at a pre-arranged venue.

Class Meetings and Work

I hope we spend most of our time in class in focused discussion that involves most of us. I proceed on the assumption that when you come to class you are prepared to raise questions from and comment on the readings and materials of the course. Occasionally, of course, one might be less than fully prepared, but on average, I expect you to come ready to talk about the readings. The difficult part is that there are so many things in the readings for a week that we will need some focus. I will try to provide that, but you must work at this, too.

Please remember that each meeting for our class represents one week; missing one class is equivalent then to missing a week of day classes. If you miss class, you are of course responsible for knowing what happened and what will happen next time. Missing class when things are due to be handed in means that you forfeit the chance to hand those items in.

More than two (2) missed classes will make it difficult for you to earn a C grade or higher, no matter what your grades are on the written work. Please remember this.

(1) Discussion/participation grade (25 percent). I put great stock by the readings chosen for the course and evidence of your engagement with and response to them. Hence, the discussion/participation segment of the grade is significant. Although I know that actually talking in a group and writing notes in preparation for talking are not the same, the former is quite difficult to evaluate fairly and so I rely more on the written preparation you do. Of course, often you will not be able to say all or sometimes even any of what you prepared to say, but you still will be credited with this preparation.

For each class meeting I ask that you prepare and bring a discussion preparation memo that focuses on 4-5 issues, puzzles, questions, problems, confusions, etc., from your reading. These, as much as possible, should "fit" the shaping suggestions I provide for you for the week's reading, although some flexibility here is of course possible. I will collect this memo for each class and it will become part of your evaluated work under the discussion/participation segment of the work.

They should not be "reading notes" that only reiterate what you find in the text. Rather, they are intended to be a collection of 4-5 focused commentaries (about 2 pages, single-spaced with 1.5 inch margins [so I can write in them]) in which you shape a response or reflection to specific parts of the reading. If you check out the definition of "memorandum," you see that it is understood as "a note designating something to be remembered, esp. something to be done or acted upon in the future; reminder" (in my dictionary, anyway). That "something to be remembered" is the insight, puzzle, confusion, question, comment that emerged as you read and that you pursue in writing the memo. The "future" part is a sense that this is something that you might want to look into in more detail, both in the readings and perhaps elsewhere, later.

When I say that these memos must be "specific," I mean that you will want to cite page numbers from the readings assigned that link each of your comments to a particular place/s in the text, the place where you read and from which you then thought and wrote.

I will collect your discussion preparation memo at the end of each class. I won't accept discussion memos after the end of the class meeting for which they were prepared and in which we have had the discussion. Be sure to keep a copy of these for yourself.

(2) End of term exam (20 percent). There will be a comprehensive aural final examination at the end of the course, held during final exam week, in small groups of 4-5 students that I will form at that time. Details of this exam will follow as the time nears, but you should make your post-semester travel plans accordingly. Inform those who might be making your travel plans that you cannot leave campus before 20 December at 9 pm. Please do not ask to take this exam early.

Absences from this exam will not be excused. Early or late exams are not given. Bona fide "emergencies" are considered only if they are offered up to me personally in advance of the exam.

(3) Two essays (27.5 percent each). In addition, I ask you to write two essays on topics of your choice but that must be negotiated with me and that are due at specified points during the semester--on October 5 and December 14.

These each may not exceed 5 double-spaced pages. I expect the papers to be carefully thought-out, multi-draft, edited pieces of work. Check the meaning of "essay" before you plan your writing strategies (an essay is not the same as "a research paper"; I do not expect you to read anything in addition to the course readings in order to write these papers). The final draft should be as free of mechanical errors as possible.

These papers must draw directly and in detail from the texts we use in class. Although they may draw on the films we see, they must draw primarily on readings assigned. They have to be focused sufficiently well to allow you to write a well-organized, clear, and thoughtful discussion in five pages. This is a big challenge

The most difficult thing here for students usually is selecting an appropriately focused, narrowed topic. I will review and approve your proposed writing strategies according to the following schedule:

FIRST PAPER SECOND PAPER

Proposal due for paper 1 by September 20; Proposal is due by November 16;

Rough draft due by September 28; Rough draft is due by November 26;

Final paper due October 5. Final paper is due December 14.

The sooner you can begin talking to me about ideas and strategies, the better. More importantly, you should start talking to yourself as you write your discussion preparation memos. Use email to pass your ideas by me, NOT a piece of paper since we see each other only once a week (my email address: joseph.schneider@drake.edu). Notice that some of these due dates are NOT at the time of our class meetings.

Let me see what you are planning far enough in advance to enable me to respond in a way that might be helpful. Although only the final version of each paper is graded, the first two parts are required in order to avoid a lowered grade on the final paper (half a grade deducted for a missed rough draft and 1 grade point for a missed proposal). I will keep copies of the proposals and drafts you submit, with my responses.

Finally, I assume that you will get ideas for your writing from your reading, thought, and discussions about the materials of the course. If you have moved from your reading and discussion preparation memos to a topic for writing, you should point that out to me in detail in your proposal. Don't hesitate to use segments of your reading and memo writing as parts of the developing draft of the paper (this is what writing as a "process" means).

When thinking about what you might want to write about, remember the theme of the course has to do with links between morality, discourse, and subjectivity in terms of the historical, cultural, and social details about which we read. Aim to make explicit just how your proposals and final papers are connected to that theme.

Recommended Future Reading

I want just to note here a few books that you could consider for future reading, in addition, of course, to those noted in the reference section of the books you have for the course.

Topic and Reading Outline

In the outline below I have marked the dates for your reading and discussion. I also have noted the various deadlines for the two papers.

You may hand in only one paper at a final deadline. The topic for your first essay should be taken from the materials that have come in the first part of the course; that of the second should be on materials after the first paper deadline.

Proposals due for first paper, Thursday 20 September, via email

Readings:

Rough draft due for first paper, Friday 28 September by 4:30 pm

(use jws mailbox Howard 326 or slide under office door HOW 130)

Readings:

Final draft due for first paper, Friday 5 October by 4:30 pm

(use jws mailbox Howard 326 or slide under office door HOW 130)

IV. Aspects of Mundane Life in A Revolutionary Society

Readings:

V. What Is the "Cultural Revolution"?: Official Documents

Readings:

Proposals due, paper 2, Friday 16 November, via email by 4:30 pm

 

Thanksgiving Holiday, 21-23 November

Rough draft due for second paper, Monday 26 November by 4:30 pm

(use jws mailbox Howard 326 or slide under office door HOW 130)

 

IX. "Postsocialism," Post-Tiananmen, The "Return" of Hong Kong,

and the Global Market

 

Readings:

Final draft due for second paper, Friday 14 December,

before 4:30 pm

(use jws mailbox Howard 326 or slide under office door HOW 130)

 

*****Comprehensive aural final exam:

You must be available for the final exam until at least

Thursday December 20, 9:00 pm*****